Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments

ietf-openpgp

Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments

2006-09-19 16:32:05

On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 06:55:32PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:

I'm not against a SHA-256 or 512 based MDC.


This would make encryption/decryption measurably slower, for no benefit
whatsoever. SHA1 provides a comfortable security margin even taking all
recent developments into consideration.

-- 
Daniel

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments, Derek Atkins Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments, Jon Callas Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments, Werner Koch Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments, Ian G Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments, David Shaw Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments, Werner Koch Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments, David Shaw Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments, Ian G Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments, Jon Callas Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments, David Shaw Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments, Daniel A. Nagy <= RE: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments, Anton Stiglic Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments, Werner Koch Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments, Lutz Donnerhacke Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments, Marko Kreen Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments, David Shaw Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments, Ian G Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments, Daniel A. Nagy Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments, "Hal Finney"

Previous by Date:	Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments, David Shaw
Next by Date:	RE: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments, Anton Stiglic
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments, David Shaw
Next by Thread:	RE: [Sam Hartman] Openpgp comments, Anton Stiglic
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]