Re: Rechartering the OpenPGP WG

On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, David Shaw wrote:

> I have the Camellia draft (new one coming in a few days - thanks to
> everyone for all the comments), and Len Sassaman mentioned Whirlpool.
> If the charter can be written that way, I think a good addition would
> be a general statement about adding (or rejecting) new algorithms as
> they come up.
Yep, I'm working on the Whirlpool draft; I've been held up with some
conference submissions, etc., but having a line-item for possible new
hashs considered would be nice.