Re: [openpgp] it's option 2 (was: Re: ways forward wrt IETF wg - please

On Fri 2015-04-10 07:37:29 -0400, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Please send a mail to the list if you're willing and able to do
> editing or review of drafts during this calendar year. (Say which
> or both.) If you'd also be implementing in roughly that timeframe
> feel free to say that too. Doing that in the next week would be
> a fine thing. (So deadline: April 17th.)
I'm willing and able to do editing and review of drafts related to RFC
4880bis during this calendar year.

I'm not directly responsible for any particular OpenPGP implementation
upstream, but i would be willing to supply patches to free software (to
the extent of my ability and time) that implement sensible decisions
within the next calendar year as well, and would be happy to try to help
good free software implementations get wider distribution and testing
via my involvement in Debian.

        --dkg

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp