On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
<dkg(_at_)fifthhorseman(_dot_)net>
wrote:
On Thu 2015-06-04 04:35:24 -0400, Werner Koch wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2015 00:58, cdl(_at_)asgaard(_dot_)org said:
* inclusion of the CFRG elliptic curves
Does that mean we can finish the goal only if we include these curves
(as MUST algorithms)?
I don't think this says anything about MUST algorithms (that'd be part
of the MTI update decisions, which the charter doesn't make any
statement about). I personally think that a 4880bis without at least
one of the CFRG curves in it would be a bit of a shame, but that's with
no hats on.
If the group disagrees with that (if we're generally ok with the value
of a 4880bis without any updated curves) then we should loosen the
language in the charter so that it's not a requirement for 4880bis.
Do we want to do a rough straw poll on this?
No. absolutely not.
We are in a charter discussion. At this point all we need to know is if
this is something people may want to discuss when CFRG is finished.
I think it is obviously something the WG will probably want to consider and
if not, the AD should come and slap people with a wet fish till they do.
So all we need to do at this stage is to ask if anyone objects to
discussing the CFRG curves as MTI. It should be called out in the charter
because it is a cross-WG, cross-IETF/IRTF issue but we can't make a
decision on it right now.
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp