ietf-openpgp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [openpgp] Default preferences for the future

2017-03-22 10:09:01
Werner Koch <wk(_at_)gnupg(_dot_)org> writes:

On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:55, mdb(_at_)juniper(_dot_)net said:

and we do not yet really need SHA-3. That said, if you want to add
agility to OpenPGP, you could define SHA3-256 and SHA3-512 code points.
I see little point in any of the other alternatives.

I added these codepoints to the list of hash algorithms.

      |        12 | SHA3-256 [FIPS202]              | "SHA3-256"   |
      |        13 | Reserved                        |              |
      |        14 | SHA3-512 [FIPS202]              | "SHA3-512"   |

Okay?

Yeah, this seems reasonable to me. 

I do worry a little bit that we are adding more flexibility than we need
today which could make it more painful for all implementations to
properly interoperate.

I also updated the reference to FIPS documents to the latest versions.

Okay.

        -- Mark

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp