Werner Koch <wk(_at_)gnupg(_dot_)org> writes:
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:55, mdb(_at_)juniper(_dot_)net said:
and we do not yet really need SHA-3. That said, if you want to add
agility to OpenPGP, you could define SHA3-256 and SHA3-512 code points.
I see little point in any of the other alternatives.
I added these codepoints to the list of hash algorithms.
| 12 | SHA3-256 [FIPS202] | "SHA3-256" |
| 13 | Reserved | |
| 14 | SHA3-512 [FIPS202] | "SHA3-512" |
Okay?
Yeah, this seems reasonable to me.
I do worry a little bit that we are adding more flexibility than we need
today which could make it more painful for all implementations to
properly interoperate.
I also updated the reference to FIPS documents to the latest versions.
Okay.
-- Mark
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp