Re: Tentative OPES Agenda for IETF 53

Item #3 in the list below was all that I was looking for...           
Regards   John
Ian Cooper wrote:

> --On Tuesday, March 12, 2002 11:10 -0800 "Condry, Michael W." 
> <condry(_at_)intel(_dot_)com> wrote:
> > I do not believe you read what I wrote.
> >
> > I am not objecting to personalization.
> >
> > I do believe that OPES protocols will consider the needs of
> > personalization as one applications area.
> >
> > I also believe there are many other aspects to personalization than suit
> > OPES's charter.
> >
> > Language translation, shopping assistant, picture transcodeing, stream
> > re-coding, these are all applications that will benefit from the OPES
> > architecture. But I do not expect they are on the OPES working group
> > agenda.
>
> Right.  These are applications of the technology to accomplish 
> specific tasks.  All need to be considered within the architecture of 
> the system being created, but none seem like things this working group 
> should be addressing as specific work items.