In my opinion, the work on personalization directly line up with at least
the original OPES work.
I also strongly belive that the OPES senarios should also align with the
work that is currently done in W3C in multi-modal working group.
There is also, correlation with the W3C webservices initiative, at least
from the security prospectives.
The above should be taken into consideration when we look at the
From: John G. Waclawsky [mailto:jgw(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 12:46 PM
To: Condry, Michael W.
Cc: Knight, Paul [BL60:1A00:EXCH]; OPES Group
Subject: Re: Tentative OPES Agenda for IETF 53
Could you expand a little on why you do not consider personalization an OPES
item? At a minimum I believe it is strongly related because opes could
provide new ways of accomplishing it. Regards John
Condry, Michael W. wrote:
IMHO Personalization is an interesting topic area but not an OPES item in my
opinion. Clearly I was interested in this area!
It would be useful to extract the key observations made and discuss them on
the mailing list/working group.
At 06:34 AM 3/12/2002, Paul Knight wrote:
Although I agree the workgroup charter and IAB considerations are obviously
the primary focus of our work, I did want to point out another two (non-WG)
IDs which contain valuable input to the discussions:
- draft-barbir-opes-spcs-01.txt, "Requirements for an OPES Service
Personalization Callout Server", which contains some good discussion of
callout server issues
- draft-barbir-opes-fsp-01.txt, "A Framework for Service Personalization".
In addition to personalization elements, this also contains a useful section
on threat analysis and security mechanisms, which may be a good starting
point for these issues across OPES.
I hope these will be useful as input to the WG discussions.
From: Markus Hofmann [ <mailto:markus(_at_)mhof(_dot_)com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 1:54 AM
To: OPES Group
Cc: Hilarie Orman; Allison Mankin; Ned Freed; Patrik Fältström
Subject: Tentative OPES Agenda for IETF 53
below the tentative agenda for the OPES meeting at IETF 53. Focus will
be on the next immediate document deliverables and on how we want to
get there - and less on existing Internet Drafts that have previously
been submitted with reference to OPES.
This also implies that we do not necessarily take existing IDs as
starting points for the WG docments, but that we rather consider them
valuable input, taking into account the final charter and the IAB
considerations for OPES.
It is important that we get more discussions going on the list prior
to the meeting. Thanks to Hilarie for initiating a threat on content
path security/encryption. Please read Hilarie's posting and comment on
it. Also feel free to comment on relevant issues listed below. Without
discussion, no progress!
Agenda for OPES Meeting at IETF53
- Introduction, minutes taker, blue sheets
- Agenda bashing
- Charter walk-hhrough
- Discussion of workplan, milestones, and how we want to get there.
- Disussion on the end-to-end integrity and encryption compatibility
issue for proposal to the ADs.
- Discussion of next WG documents
- Scenario document
- Architecture document
- Callout protocol/tracing requirements
- Endpoint authorization and enforcement document
- Threat/risk model document
Related Internet Drafts (non-WG drafts)
- draft-elson-icap-00.txt (expired)
- draft-mchenry-opes-deployment-scenarios-00.txt (expired)
- draft-rafalow-opes-policy-requirements-00.txt (expired)
Michael W. Condry
Director, Network Edge Technology