Re: OPES protocol, pre-draft

Alex Rousskov wrote:

> A possible alternative is to have the default dependent on the
> application protocol binding. I think many OCP defaults are best
> determined by the application protocol, but I am worried that having
> many application defaults would make the protocol difficult to analyze
> without referring to a specific application binding. Opinions?
Please let's avoid having too many different application defaults and 
options - options always complicate the protocol and if there's no 
really strong, strong reason for them, let's try to avoid them. In 
this specific case, I'd assume it's perfectly fine to defne a general 
default.
Thanks,
  MArkus