ietf-openproxy
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: draft-ietf-opes-threats-03

2003-12-09 10:55:25

Alex,

u really need to recharter if u want to address current concerns.

They are complaining about bad certificates.

Basically, we can not (OPES) be in the way without comming up with a new
model.

Abbie


-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Rousskov [mailto:rousskov(_at_)measurement-factory(_dot_)com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:51 PM
To: Barbir, Abbie [CAR:1A11:EXCH]
Cc: Markus Hofmann; 'ietf-openproxy(_at_)imc(_dot_)org'
Subject: RE: draft-ietf-opes-threats-03


On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Abbie Barbir wrote:

U need to recharter first.

Not if we are addressing current IESG concerns about an 
existing WG document with a couple of paragraphs, I guess. I 
am not proposing any new "real work" in this direction.

Alex.

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Rousskov [mailto:rousskov(_at_)measurement-factory(_dot_)com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:03 PM
To: Markus Hofmann
Cc: 'ietf-openproxy(_at_)imc(_dot_)org'
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-opes-threats-03



Markus,

  I am somewhat surprised there is something special that 
needs to be 
developed for a hop-by-hop encryption model, but I do not 
know what 
IESG had to say about this issue (beyond a cryptic 
statement on the 
ID tracker). If IESG turns this revision around again, 
let's discuss 
how we can document hop-by-hop encryption to address IESG 
concerns.

Thanks,

Alex.

On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Markus Hofmann wrote:


Folks,

this updated version of the draft addresses issues in Section 
2.2.7 that came back from IESG review.

The section has been re-written to clarify that - for now -
the OPES
work assumes either no encryption (in which case OPES
services can be
performed) or end-to-end encryption (in which case no OPES 
services can be performed). If encryption would be desired 
hop-by-hop, an appropriate model will have to be developed.

We'll re-submit this version to the IESG.

Thanks,
   Markus


Abbie Barbir wrote:

Please publish the following

draft-ietf-opes-threats-03

as a WG Draft.

Thanks
Abbie





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>