JFCM,
Basically, u need a rough new charter.
It would be good if u start one.
Abbie
-----Original Message-----
From: jfcm [mailto:info(_at_)utel(_dot_)net]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 1:04 PM
To: Markus Hofmann; OPES Group
Subject: Re: OPES Re-Charter
Sorry, I could not keep with the work and political load.
I certainly keep reading and supporting.
I am however lost with the accomplished task real status.
I would suggest a summary and "what can be built with" page
would preface
the charter.
And may be links to what is on the market today/sometimes.
SMTP and DNS are my priorities.
jfc
At 17:37 09/06/04, Markus Hofmann wrote:
Folks,
time to start discussion and work on a new charter for the
WG. In case
there's enough interest and willingness to continue the
work, let's try to
draft a new charter in time for the upcoming IETF meeting in
San Diego.
BUT: WE'LL ONLY DRAFT A NEW CHARTER IF THERE ARE ENOUGH ACTIVE
PARTICIPANTS COMMITTED TO WORKING ON THE NEW ITEMS!
From previous discussions, the following candidate topics for
re-chartering have been discussed:
(1) Rules Language
(2) OCP profile for SMTP
(3) Support for streaming media
(4) Others?
Please indicate which topics are of interest to you, and whether you
can
commit to work on the respective item(s). We can move
forward only if
folks are able to spend the time required for making progress.
In the interest of having a very focused and narrow charter (and from
previous discussions), I would suggest to focus on the first
two topics.
If this is agreeable, we'd continue to work on a charter for
these two items.
Unfortunately, Marshall will no longer be available as
Co-Chair, due to
time commitments to other things. A big "Thank you" is in order for
Marshall's help and support in focusing the WG and moving it forward
- Thanks, Marshall.
We're trying to find a new Co-Chair, but will already start
working on
a
new charter.
Thanks,
Markus