ietf-smime
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: PKCS #9 Internet Draft??

1997-11-12 05:30:57
Perhaps we should add a section to the CMS document that includes the
PKCS#9 attributes.  The ESS document already defines extensiosn to this list.

What do folks think about this approach?

Russ


At 03:28 PM 11/7/97 -0800, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote:
At 02:21 PM 11/7/97 -0800, Blake Ramsdell wrote:
On Friday, November 07, 1997 1:24 PM, jsp(_at_)jgvandyke(_dot_)com
[SMTP:jsp(_at_)jgvandyke(_dot_)com] wrote:
Please note that many of the OID definitions (such as ContentType,
SigningTime, CounterSignature, and MessageDigest attributes) need to be
added to <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smime/oids.html>.

If we do this (which I think we should), we should add all of the OIDs
that are listed in section A of the message draft.  Right?

It's up to the group. I certainly don't want anything listed in two places:
that leads to bad mistakes. My own preference is to have everything in the
registry and strip them out of the documents, but I'm no coder, so I can't
say whether or not that would help or hurt implementors.


--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>