Folks,
I really am hoping to get comments on the substance of the draft. Note that it
is version 5. Each version has attempted to make modifications based on the
substantive architectural points folks have been raising. That is, the document
really is try to construct a meaningful model of what is now in operation.
While it has been a bit painful to try to incorporate new and basic points, each
time, I think it has resulted in serious improvements. While I am hoping that
folks do not come up with additional, basic points that force substantive
revisions, I'm more concerned that the document be a useful reflection of the
real-world of the Internet Mail service today.
So, comments that the document suffices would be great and -- alas -- so would
comments suggesting concern over architectural points.
d/
ps. That's not to say that concern about the choice of the term ADMD was/is
problematic, but merely that I am hoping to see other aspects of the document
discussed.
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net