Re: Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1))
2007-12-15 05:07:50
Valdis Klētnieks writes:
I'd be awfully curious to know what use-case it's actually interesting
if the mail was *delivered* to all recipients, but *not* whether all
recipients have actually read/processed the message.
Here in Germany there are two kinds of whatsitcalled, the kind of postal
mail where delivery is recorded. The cheaper kind records delivery into
the recipient's mailbox. It's used most of the time, so obviously there
are use cases for it. The expensive kind records that the envelope is
handed to the recipient personally.
Phrased differently - when is it interesting to know that the mail has
been delivered into an abandoned mailbox that hasn't been read in 6
months?
My bank sends me lots of utterly mail that I am supposed to read within
four weeks. If I don't I lose the right to have mistakes fixed. I'm
sure the bank would like to know when I first had the opportunity to
read the mail.
Arnt
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1)), (continued)
- Re: Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1)), Tony Finch
- Re: Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1)), Dave Crocker
- Re: Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1)), Tony Finch
- Re: Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1)), Dave Crocker
- Re: Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1)), Tony Finch
- Re: Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1)), Dave Crocker
- Re: Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1)), Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1)), Dave Crocker
- Re: Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1)), Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1)), John C Klensin
- Re: Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1)),
Arnt Gulbrandsen <=
- Re: Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1)), Alex van den Bogaerdt
- Re: Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1)), Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1)), Alex van den Bogaerdt
- Re: Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1)), Dave Crocker
- Re: Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1)), Alex van den Bogaerdt
- Re: Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1)), Tony Finch
- Re: Lists and aliases, Frank Ellermann
- Re: Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1)), Alex van den Bogaerdt
- Re: Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1)), Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Lists and aliases (Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) to Draft Standard (1)), Sabahattin Gucukoglu
|
|
|