Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008

Now that the appeal is done and out of the way, do people prefer

1) none of the domain names be changed?
2) all domain names be changed, except Jon Postel's isi.edu and usc.edureferences
3) all domain names be changed


option 1.  is there a good reason to change them?

Keith

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008), (continued) Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008), John Leslie Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008), John C Klensin Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008), ned+ietf-smtp Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008), SM Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008), John C Klensin Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008), SM Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008), John C Klensin Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008), Chris Newman Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, Hector Santos Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, Alessandro Vesely Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, Keith Moore <= Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, John Leslie Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, Francesco Gennai Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, Francesco Gennai Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, Cyrus Daboo Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008, Chris Newman