Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
Tony Hansen writes:
Now that the appeal is done and out of the way, do people prefer
1) none of the domain names be changed?
2) all domain names be changed, except Jon Postel's isi.edu and
usc.edu references
3) all domain names be changed
I would like to get a quick consensus call for this question. Please
respond by Thursday, July 10.
If it isn't broke, don't fix it. 1.
+1.
(Yes, I know that using non-2606 names has caused problems in many
other documents. But I don't see what problems 2821bis will bring over
and above what 821 and 2821 already have brought.)
Arnt