[Top] [All Lists]

Re: abnf for <atext> in RFC 5321?

2011-05-11 16:13:57

The introduction paragraph of section 4.1.2 explicitly links to two other RFCs for the missing syntax definitions, and indeed the second one (RFC 5222) contains a proper definition of atext. I did not read the whole of RFC 5222 recently, but a simple search found this definition quickly and it seems pretty well-defined. Copying it over to RFC 5321 might be more convenient though.


On 05/11/2011 11:15 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:


<atext> seems to be an undefined rule in RFC 5321.

This is being noticed in a couple of different fora, so it's worth resolving/fixing.