Re: Recipient is offline


Tony Finch wrote:

John Levine <johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com> wrote:

Loophole?

 S: 452 keep mail on server


I should have thought of that :-) But it has more of a "temporarily"
caveat than POP services usually do.

Yes, but if a ODMR client did that (rejected after telling the serverto send), the server will discard and denied access to ODMR. Right?


Good catch John.

--
Sincerely

Hector Santos
http://www.santronics.com

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Recipient is offline, (continued) Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Re: Recipient is offline, John C Klensin Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Re: Recipient is offline, Robert A. Rosenberg Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch Re: Recipient is offline, Dave CROCKER Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch Re: Recipient is offline, Dave CROCKER Re: Recipient is offline, John Levine Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos <= Re: Recipient is offline, John Levine Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos Re: Recipient is offline, Dave CROCKER Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos Re: Recipient is offline, Hector

Previous by Date:	Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch
Next by Date:	Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos
Previous by Thread:	Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch
Next by Thread:	Re: Recipient is offline, John Levine
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]