Re: Recipient is offline


Tony Finch wrote:

ODMR is better than POP in retaining the message envelope and not havingthe "keep mail on server" loophole.

I'm not quite seeing this if the comparison is with POP. Can youelaborate?

If the idea is for the user to now use his POP3 client to connect thishis lite SMTP server setup, and not his main host, then the "keep mailon server" idea was simply shifted to another machine. No?


--
Sincerely

Hector Santos
http://www.santronics.com

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Recipient is offline, (continued) Re: Recipient is offline, Robert A. Rosenberg Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch Re: Recipient is offline, Dave CROCKER Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch Re: Recipient is offline, Dave CROCKER Re: Recipient is offline, John Levine Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos Re: Recipient is offline, John Levine Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos <= Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos Re: Recipient is offline, Dave CROCKER Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Re: Recipient is offline, Robert A. Rosenberg Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch Re: Recipient is offline, ned+ietf-smtp

Previous by Date:	Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos
Next by Date:	Re: Recipient is offline, John Levine
Previous by Thread:	Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos
Next by Thread:	Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]