On 7/20/2014 5:50 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
This specification does not deal with the verification of return
paths for use in delivery notifications. Recent work, such as that
on SPF [29] and DKIM [30] [31], has been done to provide ways to improve
traceability of the message.
While they do do that, the sentence seems to me a non-sequitor and in
particular has nothing to do with the return address, per se.
So my question is how it helps the SMTP specification reader to have a
sentence like that and to have it there?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp