Toute connaissance est une réponse à une question.
On Jul 20, 2014, at 16:36, Dave Crocker <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net> wrote:
On 7/20/2014 5:50 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
This specification does not deal with the verification of return
paths for use in delivery notifications. Recent work, such as that
on SPF  and DKIM  , has been done to provide ways to improve
traceability of the message.
While they do do that, the sentence seems to me a non-sequitor and in
particular has nothing to do with the return address, per se.
So my question is how it helps the SMTP specification reader to have a
sentence like that and to have it there?
I had the feeling that by removing the last sentence you were making too much
of a change therefore the rejection of the errata
Correcting the incorrect sentence may be acceptable for an errata
How is it helpful? By pointing people in a direction for further reading
ietf-smtp mailing list