The problem with BINARYMIME is that unless everyone supports it, someone
may have to transform the message... and that will break DKIM signatures
and make life annoying. Hence my colleagues question about a mime aware
dkim canonicalization format as a pre-req for binarymime.
Brandon
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Ned Freed
<ned(_dot_)freed(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com> wrote:
Alexey Melnikov writes:
I think support for RFC 3030 CHUNKING extension is much more
common these days, but I need to double check major SMTP server
implementations.
Neither Exim nor Postfix. What else counts as major or common nowadays?
Gmail perhaps? It does chunking, but not binarymine.
FWIW, we support client/server chunking but our binarymime support is
server
only. (The logic here is that it's main use is for mobile client
submission.)
It support calls are any indication there are several widely used chunking
implementations out there. (With some bugs.) Binarymime, not so much.
Ned
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp