[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-smtp] Adding a new value to the WITH protocol type subregistry

2018-07-12 12:45:06
On 7/12/2018 10:32 AM, John Levine wrote:
Given that keywords are cheap and the namespace is effectively
unlimited I agee that specification required makes more sense.

I'm inclined to agree.

I don't recall why the original requirement was made so stringent. Does anyone else?


Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking

ietf-smtp mailing list