[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-smtp] [Uta] New Version Notification for draft-levine-additional-registered-clauses-00

2019-01-24 19:32:05
I don't suppose you guys could look at the "Guidance for Designated Expert" in the draft and let me know if you have improvements?

On Thu, 24 Jan 2019, John C Klensin wrote:

--On Thursday, January 24, 2019 20:26 +0000 "Salz, Rich"
<rsalz(_at_)akamai(_dot_)com> wrote:

   changes the registry criteria to Expert Review so you
   don't need to
    publish an RFC merely to register a new clause.

Spec required, so it's written down somewhere what it means?
An I-D is sufficient; you don't have to go through RFC
publication.  Or will these things be "intuitively obvious" ?


As I have always understood it, "spec required" means a
published, stable, readily-accessible, etc., specification.
Not necessarily an RFC but, until the definition of an I-D is
changed to eliminate all of the "don't reference except as 'work
in progress'" and "expires in six months" stuff, it would be
unusual (and objectionable) for posting a spec as an I-D to


John Levine, johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.

ietf-smtp mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>