[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-smtp] [Uta] New Version Notification for draft-levine-additional-registered-clauses-00

2019-01-25 04:45:55
Hi all,

On 24 Jan 2019, at 23:41, Salz, Rich <rsalz(_at_)akamai(_dot_)com> wrote:

  As I have always understood it, "spec required" means a
   published, stable, readily-accessible, etc., specification.
   Not necessarily an RFC but, until the definition of an I-D is
   changed to eliminate all of the "don't reference except as 'work
   in progress'" and "expires in six months" stuff, it would be
   unusual (and objectionable) for posting a spec as an I-D to

The TLS expert group, in agreement with the Security AD's, did exactly this.  
Start your objections. :)

I don’t think there is universal agreement with IESG that I-Ds qualify. So you 
might need to talk to your AD ;-).

Best Regards,

ietf-smtp mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>