Apropos of recent discussions about SNI logging, here's a draft that adds
an SNI clause to Received: headers, and per Chris Newman's suggestion,
changes the registry criteria to Expert Review so you don't need to
publish an RFC merely to register a new clause.
Regards,
John Levine, johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 14:44:52
From: internet-drafts(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
A new version of I-D, draft-levine-additional-registered-clauses-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by John Levine and posted to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft-levine-additional-registered-clauses
Revision: 00
Title: Update to Additional Registered Clauses in SMTP Received Headers
Document date: 2019-01-24
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 4
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-levine-additional-registered-clauses-00.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-levine-additional-registered-clauses/
Htmlized:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levine-additional-registered-clauses-00
Htmlized:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-levine-additional-registered-clauses
Abstract:
SMTP servers add Received: trace headers to mail messages to track
their progress This document updates the registration criteria for
Additional Registered Clauses in those headers to Expert Review, and
adds a new clause for Server Name Indication (SNI).
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp