On 1/2/2020 9:56 AM, Hector Santos wrote:
We am supportive of focusing on SMTP compliancy fine tuning. The
administrative local policy stuff, while all good to know, good for an
Informational Status doc, but not a BCP, nor for RFC5321bis PS work,
it would be never ending with extremely rough positions. If some
local sites decide to reject IP-literals based on decision that
contains bias so be it, they will deal with the false positives, but
it is not SMTP.
arggh! I am ....
--
HLS
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp