ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

re: Financial Stnadards Work group?

2000-05-15 21:50:02
I do not quiet agree with the current standards, they are a pain in the
neck.  E.g ( Just one example ) I want the internet debit card and the
devices for charging them to be standard hardware available in any computer
store.  This will allow one to chose any bank or service provider ( instead
of your money going proprietory ): imagine buying a new modem or router
every time you change ISPs or buying different kinds of printers for
printing from different web sites.  That is the position of debit card
recharging buying a new device each time you change the service provider.
The IETF can help or do you hold alternative views  ( give me some
recharging devices that allow change overs )??

Yours sincerely,
Nyagudi Musandu

At 10:28 14/05/00 -0700, you wrote:
Musandu <musandu(_at_)arcc(_dot_)or(_dot_)ke> writes:

It may just be time for the IETF to develop a financial standards
work group separate from the applications work group.  I can even >forsee 
a Simple Cash Transfer Protocol? any objections?

There is an ANSI Financial Standards body (X9) which is also chair of the 
ISO Financial Standards group.

The electronic commerce payments working group (X9A10) has a draft standard 
for all electronic retail payments (debit, credit, pre-paid, electronic 
cash, etc) .. X9.59.


misc. ref

http://www.x9.org/
http://www.x9.org/main_organization.html
http://www.x9.org/subcomms/x9a/general/public/general.html
http://www.tc68.org/
http://www.x9.org/n20.html
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#224
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/8583flow.htm
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/draft-wheeler-ipki-aads-01.txt

& of course my rfc index is also at:

http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm

as well as ietf, payments, security, X9F, and financial glossaries



--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler      lynn(_at_)adcomsys(_dot_)net, 
lynn(_at_)garlic(_dot_)com
  http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/  http://www.adcomsys.net/lynn/






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>