Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!

ietf

Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!

2000-08-03 09:40:04

No, what will happen is one IPv6 prefix per household/car/whatever,
and therefore no reason for NAT.

  Brian

"Rakers, Jason" wrote:


When household appliances begin becoming IP addressable, I think we will see
a move towards assigning an Internet IP address per household (much like
today's street address).  The household will perform NAT for all devices
within (one street address can house many people, not just one).

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Dennis Glatting Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Magnus Danielson RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Dawson, Peter D Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Brian E Carpenter RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Rakers, Jason Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Andre-John Mas Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Brian E Carpenter <= Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Måns Nilsson Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Andre-John Mas RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, R A Lichtensteiger Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Keith Moore Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Anthony Atkielski Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Steven Cotton Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Steve Deering RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Evstiounin, Mikhail RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Parkinson, Jonathan RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Rakers, Jason

Previous by Date:	Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, vinton g. cerf
Next by Date:	RE: Heard at the IETF, Parkinson, Jonathan
Previous by Thread:	Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Andre-John Mas
Next by Thread:	Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Måns Nilsson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]