RE: HTML better for small PDAs

ietf

RE: HTML better for small PDAs

2001-02-23 04:00:03

-----Original Message-----
From: Valdis(_dot_)Kletnieks(_at_)vt(_dot_)edu 
[SMTP:Valdis(_dot_)Kletnieks(_at_)vt(_dot_)edu]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 3:37 AM
To:   Doug Sauder
Cc:   ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject:      Re: HTML better for small PDAs 


1) Was your millenia-old data *written in XML*, or was it *converted to*
XML
within the past 5 years?

        This is not a valid argument.  Egyptian Hieroglyphs were not written
in ASCII either !

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: HTML better for small PDAs, graham . travers <= Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Valdis . Kletnieks RE: HTML better for small PDAs, Christian Huitema Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Robert G. Ferrell HTML same problem with TXT. XML/SGML the solution, Wang Xianzhu Re: HTML same problem with TXT. XML/SGML the solution, Bill Manning Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Valdis . Kletnieks RE: HTML better for small PDAs, graham . travers RE: HTML better for small PDAs, Christian Huitema RE: HTML better for small PDAs, graham . travers Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Michael Richardson

Previous by Date:	Re: Why XML is perferable, Jon Crowcroft
Next by Date:	RE: Why XML is perferable, Shaw, Robert
Previous by Thread:	Sascom finally available outside Japan, Ole J. Jacobsen
Next by Thread:	Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Valdis . Kletnieks
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]