----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Crawford" <crawdad(_at_)fnal(_dot_)gov>
To: <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 3:42 AM
Subject: Making the IETF meeting network more representative of the real
world
I liked Tony Hain's suggestion that the future IETF terminal room/
wireless LAN ntworks should offer NATted IPv4 and plain IPv6, to
better reflect the choices available to much of the world. But I
don't think that puts the two on an equal footing, so in addition
the network ought to undergo an IPv6 renumbering during Wednesday.
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12342.html
VHS vs. BETAMAX....
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12524.html
RFC-2001-06-27-001 - Obtaining IPv8 Address Allocations
The "toy" IPv4 Internet is a sewer.
IPv8 is designed to be a swamp to cover the sewer.
IPv16 is the "high-ground"....
...here are some links...
Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com
Mars 128n 128e
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12213.html
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12223.html
