At 10:11 AM 8/9/2001, Keith Moore wrote:
> Seriously, are we really saying that NAT is great for consumers,
> but keep them away from the IETF network because we *know* it won't
> work?
it's actually the opposite:
- we *know* that NAT has limited applicability and interferes with
applications that consumers/customers want to deploy
- at the same time most IETF attendees aren't doing things that NATs
would break.
Wrong! Most IETF'ers I know tunnel back to their home offices. I personally
use an IPsec/IKE implementation that doesn't care much for NAT.