Dave,
This was put forward specifically as work reviewed
in the IETF but not the product of an IETF working group.
Is that in error? Should this have been put forward as
the work of the beep working group?
regards,
Ted Hardie
At 11:09 AM 9/10/2001, Clemm, Geoff wrote:
When work is done in the context of an IETF working group, then
it is feasible to challenge the venue at the formation of the working
group. Since "SOAP in BEEP" was not done in the context of an
IETF working group, I believe challenges to the venue are appropriate.
Note the date of the beep working group archive entry:
[BXXPwg] new version of soap over beep published
Marshall T. Rose
<mrose+mtr(_dot_)netnews(_at_)dbc(_dot_)mtview(_dot_)ca(_dot_)us>
Tue, 3 Jul 2001 11:17:54 -0700
2.5 months is plenty of time for problems to be considered.
d/
----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker(_at_)brandenburg(_dot_)com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.273.6464