Re: Dynamic DNS at the 53rd IETF

  Again, we've had this discussion again and again - definitions of stable
vary from anything less than a month is useless, to 20 minutes is enough.


What's this "we" stuff?    

I don't ever recall anybody bothering to ask application developers whether 
it was okay for DHCP servers (much less NATs) to break open connections.

Keith

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Dynamic DNS at the 53rd IETF, Jakob Schlyter Re: Dynamic DNS at the 53rd IETF, Keith Moore Re: Dynamic DNS at the 53rd IETF, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: Dynamic DNS at the 53rd IETF, Randy Bush Re: Dynamic DNS at the 53rd IETF, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: Dynamic DNS at the 53rd IETF, Randy Bush Re: Dynamic DNS at the 53rd IETF, Keith Moore Re: Dynamic DNS at the 53rd IETF, Randy Bush Re: Dynamic DNS at the 53rd IETF, Keith Moore Re: Dynamic DNS at the 53rd IETF, Michael Richardson Re: Dynamic DNS at the 53rd IETF, Keith Moore <= Re: Dynamic DNS at the 53rd IETF, Pete Resnick Re: Dynamic DNS at the 53rd IETF, Randy Bush utility of dynamic DNS, Keith Moore Re: utility of dynamic DNS, Randy Bush Re: utility of dynamic DNS, Keith Moore Re: utility of dynamic DNS, Randy Bush Re: utility of dynamic DNS, Keith Moore Re: utility of dynamic DNS, Pete Resnick Re: utility of dynamic DNS, Keith Moore Re: utility of dynamic DNS, Theodore Tso

Previous by Date:	Re: Dynamic DNS at the 53rd IETF, Michael Richardson
Next by Date:	RE: Dynamic DNS at the 53rd IETF, Peter Ford
Previous by Thread:	Re: Dynamic DNS at the 53rd IETF, Michael Richardson
Next by Thread:	Re: Dynamic DNS at the 53rd IETF, Pete Resnick
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]