Re: [idn] WG last call summary

It is useful technical input on the first time.
By the 353th time, someone got to ask what else are they contributing?


of course once should be sufficient.   
some people don't realize that we don't do voting.

It is a protest and appeal against the last call. The IETF process specify
the exact process to do so in RFC2026 Section 6.5.


perhaps, but this isn't a justification for ignoring valid concerns.

Keith

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [idn] WG last call summary, (continued) Re: [idn] WG last call summary, ned . freed Re: [idn] WG last call summary, Valdis . Kletnieks Message not available Re: [idn] WG last call summary, D. J. Bernstein Re: [idn] WG last call summary, Thor Harald Johansen Message not available Re: [idn] WG last call summary, D. J. Bernstein Re: [idn] WG last call summary, James Seng Re: [idn] WG last call summary, D. J. Bernstein Re: [idn] WG last call summary, James Seng Re: [idn] WG last call summary, Keith Moore Re: [idn] WG last call summary, James Seng Re: [idn] WG last call summary, Keith Moore <= Re: [idn] WG last call summary, Masataka Ohta Re: [idn] WG last call summary, Paul Robinson Re: [idn] WG last call summary, Keith Moore Re: [idn] WG last call summary, Daniel Senie Re: [idn] WG last call summary, Thor Harald Johansen Re: [idn] WG last call summary, Dave Crocker Re: [idn] WG last call summary, Thor Harald Johansen Re: [idn] WG last call summary, William Blackwood Re: [idn] WG last call summary, Soobok Lee Re: [idn] WG last call summary, Paul Hoffman / IMC

Previous by Date:	Re: IETF Meetings - High Registration Fees, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Next by Date:	Re: Subjects for Thursday's IESG plenary, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Previous by Thread:	Re: [idn] WG last call summary, James Seng
Next by Thread:	Re: [idn] WG last call summary, Masataka Ohta
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]