Re: Trees have one root


on 7/30/2002 11:27 AM Dave Crocker wrote:

So if ICANN does not do that policy work, who does?  And why is it
somehow  better to have that work done elsewhere?


I agree, and I believe that I said as much. The alternate providers policy
is essentially "why can't we all just get along," which is workable for a
voluntary consortium, but not for the real root.

-- 
Eric A. Hall                                        http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols          http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Trees have one root, (continued) Re: Trees have one root, Eric A. Hall Re: Trees have one root, Keith Moore Re: Trees have one root, Eric A. Hall Re: Trees have one root, John Stracke Re: Trees have one root, Keith Moore Re: Trees have one root, John Stracke Re: Trees have one root, Keith Moore Re: Trees have one root, Dave Crocker Message not available Re: Trees have one root, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin Re: Trees have one root, Dave Crocker Re: Trees have one root, Eric A. Hall <= Re: Trees have one root, Randy Bush Re: Trees have one root, Dave Crocker Re: Trees have one root, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin Re: Trees have one root, Einar Stefferud Re: Trees have one root, vint cerf Re: Trees have one root, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: Trees have one root, Randy Bush Re: Trees have one root, Einar Stefferud Re: Trees have one root, Ole J. Jacobsen Re: Trees have one root, Joe Touch

Previous by Date:	Re: Trees have one root, Joe Touch
Next by Date:	Re: Trees have one root, Randy Bush
Previous by Thread:	Re: Trees have one root, Dave Crocker
Next by Thread:	Re: Trees have one root, Randy Bush
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]