Re[2]: Why spam is a problem.

On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:58:31 +0200 Anthony Atkielski 
<anthony(_at_)atkielski(_dot_)com> wrote:

Perry writes:

What happened to Usenet will indeed
happen to SMTP if we do not stop pretending
that the problem is insignificant.

What happened to Usenet?  Still seems fine to me.


automated spam cancellers.

richard
--
Richard Welty                                         
rwelty(_at_)averillpark(_dot_)net
Averill Park Networking                                         518-573-7592
              Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Why spam is a problem., (continued) Re: Why spam is a problem., Anthony Atkielski Re: Why spam is a problem., stanislav shalunov Re: Why spam is a problem., Theodore Ts'o Re: Why spam is a problem., stanislav shalunov Re: Why spam is a problem., Peter Deutsch RE: Why spam is a problem., Christian Huitema Re: Why spam is a problem., Perry E. Metzger Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore Re: Why spam is a problem., Russ Allbery Re: Why spam is a problem., Anthony Atkielski Re[2]: Why spam is a problem., Richard Welty <= Re: Why spam is a problem., Bob Braden RE: Why spam is a problem., Franck Martin Re: Why spam is a problem., Keith Moore RE: Why spam is a problem., william Re: Why spam is a problem., Thomas J. Hruska RE: Why spam is a problem., Christian Huitema Re: Why spam is a problem., Eric A. Hall Re: Why spam is a problem., Thomas J. Hruska RE: Why spam is a problem., Franck Martin RE: Why spam is a problem., Franck Martin

Previous by Date:	Re: Why spam is a problem., Richard Welty
Next by Date:	Re[2]: Why spam is a problem., Richard Welty
Previous by Thread:	Re: Why spam is a problem., Anthony Atkielski
Next by Thread:	Re: Why spam is a problem., Bob Braden
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]