ietf
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re[2]: arguments against NAT?

2003-12-02 08:30:15
from [Anthony G. Atkielski] [Permanent Link] 
Spencer Dawkins writes:


... perhaps there is no community consensus document
that says what the community consensus appears to be ...


I don't believe there is any consensus.  I'm among those who don't like
NAT, considering it only an occasional, necessary evil.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: arguments against NAT?, Eliot Lear
Next by Date:  RE: arguments against NAT?, Michel Py
Previous by Thread:  Re: arguments against NAT?, Spencer Dawkins
Next by Thread:  Re: arguments against NAT?, Masataka Ohta
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]