On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 07:55:13 CST, Spencer Dawkins
<spencer(_at_)mcsr-labs(_dot_)org> said:
no community consensus document that says what the community consensus
appears to be, and the best thing to do is to Google "NAT end-to-end"
and leave the result as an exercise for the reader?
You want "no consensus", wander over to the NANOG list and suggest that any ISP
who isn't aggressively filtering RFC1918 source-address packets is violating
the RFCs.. ;) You want a *flamestorm*, mention it to the Tier-1 which numbers
their point-to-points between their POPs out of 1918 space, causing blackholes
when they send ICMP messages to someplace that DOES ingress filter them ;)
pgpPtpzSaJTVJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature