Doug Royer wrote:
Anthony G. Atkielski wrote:
NAT has obvious disadvantages. ...
... Chat and instant messaging services will fail, and there is no
way to get them to work with NAT.
So far I have not been able to get chat or instant messages services to
fail because
of NAT. (Not that I am saying that NAT is valuable or a problem)
Perhaps it is more accurate to say that some NAT implementations break
chat and IM?
Some NAT implementations break (your favorite protocol here). The
problem isn't whether a particular NAT breaks a particular protocol; the
larger problem is what to do when you have a protocol you need and
you're behind a NAT you can't control.
Streaming services may fail as well.
Agreed.
Joe