Re: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security

On 10-dec-03, at 10:28, leo vegoda wrote:

> > http://lacnic.net/en/chapter-4.html
> > http://ftp.apnic.net/apnic/docs/ipv6-address-policy
> > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ipv6-policies.html
> > http://www.arin.net/policy/ipv6_policy.html
> > http://www.iana.org/ipaddress/ipv6-allocation-policy-26jun02
> In fact, we have a shorter and easier to read document giving details 
> of minimum allocation lengths. It was produced at the request of the 
> routing community and can be found at:
>    <http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/smallest-alloc-sizes.html>
> We update it when we receive a new block from the IANA.
Ok, that's good, but it doesn't fix the problem that the list of 
documents above _seems_ authoritative and says it's ok to filter at 
/32. And this isn't just theory: I'm sitting behind an ISP that filters 
out the /48 for the F root server.
(You don't mention micro allocations by the way, but unless I'm 
mistaken you guys do give those out sometimes.)