% We assign small networks to IXPs.
%
% The document has the following in it reflecting this:
%
% CIDR block Smallest RIPE NCC Smallest RIPE NCC
% Allocation Assignment
% 2001:0600::/23 /35 /48
%
% Again, if people feel that the text published needs to be improved then
% please let us know. We don't want to publish anything ambiguous or
% misleading. We're happy to improve text whenever people indicate
% improvements can be made.
%
% leo vegoda
Leo, this is the text we use for IX delegations. For CI uses, transit of
said prefix is a valid injection.
--------------------------------------------------
Exchange Point Announcement Statement
Our statement regarding the injection of EP.NET address space into a routing
system.
"anyone who has a properly delegated /32 address delegated/assigned from a /24
within 198.32.0.0/16 may announce that /24 to their peers. This is also true
in IPv6 space in that anyone with a properly delegated /64 assigned from a /48
in the 2001:0478::/32 space may annouce that /48 to their peers. Prefix
aggregates are discouraged and as a general rule may be considered to be proxy
aggregations made by parties who are not direct participants in any address
assignments from these ranges."
--bill
Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).