-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I thought I needed to pay to get to most ITU standards. But I might be
wrong.
I can't see how personal closed discussions relate to open
standardization. Are you saying that you want to have an open process,
as long as you have a direct channel to the chairs in that process? I
am not following you. I though the standardization for the IETF was
done in public, not in private emails with the chairs. And that that
was what made the IETF special.
- - kurtis -
On 2004-05-13, at 18.34, Dean Anderson wrote:
Of course, this is exactly why the third world doesn't want to have the
IETF in charge in its present form.
Professional and standards organizations aren't private clubs.
--Dean
On Wed, 12 May 2004, Kevin C. Almeroth wrote:
This pretty much does it for me: anyone who says they are entitled
to participate in the IETF immediately goes into my spam bucket.
As others have pointed out, you've done yourself more harm than good.
I'm entitled to particpate, and I'm entitled to send email to the WG
chairs as a participant.
One thing I've noticed is that of none of the people criticizing me
has
thought to address the fact that OUR ADDRESS SPACE IS NOT HIJACKED,
and
that these people associated with the IETF: Paul Vixie, Joe Abley,
Bill
Manning, and Rob Austein as WG Co-chair in his role for IETF
business, all
claim that it is. But anyone can plainly see they are lying.
Dean Anderson
Av8 Internet, Inc
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3
iQA/AwUBQKisgqarNKXTPFCVEQLJrQCgoc/TPKrlLx7QUTXsjkIkjZ8kVVsAn07g
f8jJEq6KM4+sTZqp01ScKraY
=KuSS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf