ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Mailing list identification, e.g., [IETF], in subject lines (was: RE: Names of standards-track RFCs )

2004-07-15 10:00:24
Not to feed the troll, but, if I remember correctly, the overwhelming
response is always:  we don't need it.  Procmail can filter fine without
it.

So, since there's no one vehemently opposed to it (that I can remember),
why not just turn it on, to avoid the quarterly request?  Not everyone
uses procmail / nice mailers to filter their mail.  Some people are even
forced to use Windows mailers! *shudder*

-Dave

On Thursday, 15 Jul 2004, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
Short answer:

No.

Long answer:

This item has been discussed to death once every 3 months on this very 
list. We have never found a consensus to add these tags.

                 Harald

--On 15. juli 2004 10:35 -0400 John C Klensin <john-ietf(_at_)jck(_dot_)com> 
wrote:

Hi.

Since I'm the apparent offender...

Those little inserts are a function of list management software
(which software is chosen and how it is configured), and not the
actions of individual authors (despite the indication I manually
included in this posting).  If a change in how the IETF list
works is needed, you probably need to take it up with the
Secretariat or the IESG.






_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


-- 
David Frascone

    Fife. n. Small shrill instrument that rhymes with wife.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf