Re: Mailing list identification, e.g., [IETF], in subject lines (was: RE


David Frascone wrote:
        [..]

So, since there's no one vehemently opposed to it (that I can remember),
why not just turn it on,


Finally we're a true Standards Organization.

cheers,
gja

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Names of standards-track RFCs, (continued) Re: Names of standards-track RFCs, John Stracke Re: Names of standards-track RFCs, Daniel Senie Re: Names of standards-track RFCs, Randy Presuhn Re: Names of standards-track RFCs, John C Klensin RE: Names of standards-track RFCs, Dr Harsh Verma Re: Names of standards-track RFCs, grenville armitage Re: Names of standards-track RFCs, Scott W Brim Mailing list identification, e.g., [IETF], in subject lines (was: RE: Names of standards-track RFCs ), John C Klensin Re: Mailing list identification, e.g., [IETF], in subject lines (was: RE: Names of standards-track RFCs ), Harald Tveit Alvestrand Re: Mailing list identification, e.g., [IETF], in subject lines (was: RE: Names of standards-track RFCs ), David Frascone Re: Mailing list identification, e.g., [IETF], in subject lines (was: RE: Names of standards-track RFCs ), grenville armitage <= [IETF] Mailing list identification, e.g., [IETF], in subject lines (was: RE: Names of standards-track RFCs ), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin Re: Mailing list identification, e.g., [IETF], in subject lines, Kai Henningsen Re: Names of standards-track RFCs, David Morris Re: Names of standards-track RFCs, Paul Hoffman / VPNC RE: Names of standards-track RFCs, Christian Huitema RE: Names of standards-track RFCs, John C Klensin Re: Names of standards-track RFCs, Randy.Dunlap

Re: Mailing list identification, e.g., [IETF], in subject lines (was: RE: Names of standards-track RFCs )