On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, scott bradner wrote:
If your "reduce the load enough that things can be
gotten out faster will result in deadlines closer to the
meetings" hypothesis is correct, then I'd expect that we would
already have had a review --initiated by either by the IESG or
the Secretariat and discussed with the community-- about how
much closer the deadlines could be moved,
fwiw
without changing the rules the closest we can get is two weeks
see RFC 2418 section 7.1
All relevant documents to be discussed at a session should be
published and available as Internet-Drafts at least two weeks before
a session starts.
That is a *should* ... as written, not a MUST. Which with an automated
tool would allow the WG chair to over-ride. Secondly, 'session' in my
usage would be the WG session to discuss the draft. So for a Thursday WG
session, the deadline would still be met, 1-1/2 weeks before the IETF
meeting, not two weeks...
Dave Morris
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf