--On tirsdag, oktober 19, 2004 18:39:49 -0700 Vijay Devarapalli
<vijayd(_at_)iprg(_dot_)nokia(_dot_)com> wrote:
hi Harald,
this sometimes doesnt work. for example, I submitted a 00 version
working group draft on Oct 18 draft at 2 am (PST). I dont think
the WG chair could have stayed up that late to send out the draft
for me before the submissin deadline (6 am PST). :)
I prefer just cc'ing the WG chairs when I submit the draft,
and the WG chairs, as soon as possible, sending a mail confirming
that the document should be processed as a working group document.
can you ask the secretariat if they are okay with this? :)
that was what the procedure used to be - and someone had to keep track of
the pile of I-D submissions for which there was no response (yet) from the
WG chair. That extra load is what the secretariat has been trying to avoid
during the rush.
Vijay
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
--On 18. oktober 2004 12:43 -0400 Michael Richardson
<mcr(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ottawa(_dot_)on(_dot_)ca> wrote:
I wonder if it wouldn't just be simpler to have the WG chair
submit the -00 document themselves,
I've discussed this option with the secretariat, and they think this
(having the WG chair submit or forward the document on behalf of the
author was the thing suggested) is a very reasonable thing to do - for
the spring IETF meeting.
(didn't get it on the table long enough before this meeting to change).
No opinion yet on the cutoff dates - still reading.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf