On 3 dec 2004, at 16.28, Sam Hartman wrote:
2) Allow appeals to be made but set some bar for an appeal; perhaps
appeals from IAOC members are always accepted, but appeals from the
community require say 10 signatures.
Since the IAOC is the oversight body, why would they need to appeal the
actions of the IAD? Don't they just have the right of adjudication of
any process failure by IAD ?
And I don't think we want to get into a situation where we have one
member of the IAOC appealing the actions of the IAOC.
BTW, I was just rereading the formulation sent by Harald. the one I
said I was comfortable with:
If someone believes that the IAOC has violated the IAOC rules and
procedures, he or she can ask the IETF leadership to investigate the
matter, using the same procedure as is used for appeals of procedural
issues in the IETF, starting with the IESG.
If the IESG, IAB or the ISOC BoT find that procedures are violated,
they may advise the IAOC, but does not have authority to overturn or
change a decision.
while it makes sense for the IAOC, it does not cover someone, not from
the IAOC, appealing a procedural issue of the IAD. I think there needs
to be a way for someone to initiate an appeal with the IAOC against the
IAD.
a.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf