Thus spake "Leslie Daigle" <leslie(_at_)thinkingcat(_dot_)com>
Margaret Wasserman wrote:
I was thinking more of ongoing contracts... For instance, let's
say that we contract with Margaret's Meeting Management
(MMM -- and no, I am not considering a new career :-)) for
our meeting planning. Would it be reasonable for someone
who works for MMM to be an IAOC member? Would
he/she need to recuse him/herself from every decision having to
do with meetings?
I think it would be sensible for the IAOC member to resign if
it was a problem. If they didn't resign, and the rest of the IAOC
thought it was a problem, there are recall measures (because it could
be construed as abrogation of IAOC duties).
We can require that the IAOC establish rules for dealing with conflicts of
interest, and if a member does not follow them (or perhaps does so too
frequently) they can be recalled; if that fails, particular decisions can be
appealed by the community. IMHO, this is enough.
We cannot predict every possible conflict or the most appropriate action in
each case -- nor should we try to codify such details in the BCP even if we
could. The BCP overall has evolved a tone of general guidance and public
oversight, not micromanagement, and that seems appropriate here too.
S
Stephen Sprunk "Stupid people surround themselves with smart
CCIE #3723 people. Smart people surround themselves with
K5SSS smart people who disagree with them." --Aaron Sorkin
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf