Hmm. I think this bothers me a lot unless
a) unsuccessful bidders and their agents
and
b) unsuccessful job candidates
are explicitly excluded. Otherwise, every time
the IASA awards a contract or hires somebody, they are
exposed to public attack by the unsuccessful.
In general, people do not choose to raise a public stink when they
are not hired for a job or are not chosen as a contractor, perhaps
due to a lack of desire to air those facts in public.
But, if we do have someone who wants to raise a stink and/or waste
IETF resources over that type of issue, I don't think that the lack
of a formal review process would stop them. In fact, the lack of a
reasonable way of dealing with this type of disagreement within the
IETF context might lead people to take legal action, which would be
even worse (more time consuming, expensive, damaging).
Margaret
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf