on re-reading this, I think John and I are saying the same thing. I missed
that in my earlier read. Serves me for replying too early in the morning :-(
--On torsdag, januar 27, 2005 09:07:11 +0100 Harald Tveit Alvestrand
<harald(_at_)alvestrand(_dot_)no> wrote:
John,
just one comment:
--On 26. januar 2005 10:55 -0500 John C Klensin <john-ietf(_at_)jck(_dot_)com>
wrote:
However, if the terms and conditions of the current
relationship with Foretec were acceptable to us long-term, we
would not have initiated the Admin Reorganization process, which
you, as participants in the community, presumably know perfectly
well
I believe (and have told Bob Kahn that too) that if the Foretec stuff had
been working perfectly, we would STILL do the reorganization.
In fact, I believe that if it had been a fully functional working
relationship with nobody seeing an advantage to the current undefined
state of relationships, the reorganization would have happened long
before I took on the job as IETF chair.
As you known, having been part of the effort to take steps in the same
direction....
Harald
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf